Legal Opinion

United States v. Meador

District Court, N.D. Oklahoma

Decided April 2, 1999No. 4:96-cv-00113Published

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

H. DALE COOK, District Judge.

Before the Court is defendant, Dan Meador’s, motion, styled “Application for Writ of Habeas Corpus.” However, since 28 U.S.C. § 2255 is the exclusive remedy for a prisoner in federal custody who asserts that his sentence was imposed in violation of federal law, the Court will treat Meador’s present application as a motion brought pursuant to § 2255.

In August 1996, Meador was named in a three Count Indictment, charging him with obstruction of justice and unlawfully communicating with a grand juror, in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 1503-1504. Meador proceeded to…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Maleng v. CookSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. Allen v. HardySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Michael Kapral v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1999
  4. Randall Gendron v. United States of America, Randall Gendron v. United States of America, James P. Glass v. Rodney J. AhitowCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1998
  5. Charles D. Scanio v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1994

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API