United States v. Meador
District Court, N.D. Oklahoma
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
H. DALE COOK, District Judge.
Before the Court is defendant, Dan Meador’s, motion, styled “Application for Writ of Habeas Corpus.” However, since 28 U.S.C. § 2255 is the exclusive remedy for a prisoner in federal custody who asserts that his sentence was imposed in violation of federal law, the Court will treat Meador’s present application as a motion brought pursuant to § 2255.
In August 1996, Meador was named in a three Count Indictment, charging him with obstruction of justice and unlawfully communicating with a grand juror, in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 1503-1504. Meador proceeded to…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Maleng v. CookSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Allen v. HardySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Michael Kapral v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1999
- Randall Gendron v. United States of America, Randall Gendron v. United States of America, James P. Glass v. Rodney J. AhitowCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1998
- Charles D. Scanio v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1994
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.