Legal Opinion

Wertheim v. Continental Ry. & Trust Co.

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided February 17, 1883PublishedCited by 14 opinions

Motion for Attachment of Witnesses.

1Opinion of the CourtWallace, J.

There are informalities in the record upon which this motion to attach witnesses for contempt has been argued, which lead to a denial of the motion. But counsel have desired that the main question involved should be considered and decided as a guide to their future action in the cause. This question is whether the president and secretary of the North River Construction Company, a corporation, can be compelled by a subpoena duces tecum to produce books and papers of the corporation in a suit in equity, to which the corporation is not a party, upon the application of one of the parties. The…

2Cases cited39 opinions

  1. United States v. ReyburnSupreme Court of the United States · 1832
  2. Ex parte BrownSupreme Court of Missouri · 1880
  3. Mitchell's CaseNew York Court of Common Pleas · 1861
  4. Martin v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1850
  5. Hauseman v. SterlingNew York Supreme Court · 1872

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Dowagiac Mfg. Co. v. LochrenCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1906
  2. In re HirschU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Connecticut · 1896
  3. In re the Estate of SperryNew York Surrogate's Court · 1930
  4. Crocker-Wheeler Co. v. BullockU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern Ohio · 1904
  5. In re BolsterWashington Supreme Court · 1910

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API