In re Bolster
Washington Supreme Court
Appeal from an order of the superior court for King county, Main, J., entered April 23, 1910, dismissing a proceeding to require a witness to produce documents on the taking of a deposition by a commissioner, after a hearing on the application.
1Opinion of the CourtFullerton, J.
On March 5, 1910, the superior court of the state of California, in and for the city and county of San Francisco, in a cause pending therein, issued a commission authorizing and empowering one N. W. Bolster, a notary public of the state of Washington, residing at the city of Seattle, to take the depositions of E. J. Mathews and *656one T. A. Davies, president and vice president, respectively, of a corporation known as the John J. Sesnon Company, and to require them to produce such books and papers of the corporation as should be in their possession or under their control, that the same might be…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Wertheim v. Continental Ry. & Trust Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1883
- Johnson Steel Street-Rail Co. v. North Branch Steel Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Western Pennsylvania · 1891
- Crocker-Wheeler Co. v. BullockU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern Ohio · 1904
3Cited by7 opinions
- Victor Chemical Works v. IliffIllinois Supreme Court · 1921
- Glucol Manufacturing Co. v. SchulistMichigan Supreme Court · 1927
- Harrington Manufacturing Co. v. Powell Manufacturing Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1975
- United States ex rel. Norwegian Nitrogen Products Co. v. United States Tariff CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1925
- People ex rel. Metropolitan Casualty Insurance v. Calumet National BankAppellate Court of Illinois · 1931
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.