Legal Opinion
Krause v. Commissioner of Public Safety
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided December 4, 1984No. C3-84-809PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
FOLEY, Judge.
Carl James Krause appeals an order of the district court sustaining the revocation of his driver’s license pursuant to Minn. Stat. § 169.123 (Supp.1983), the implied consent law. We reverse and remand.
FACTS
On February 25, 1984 at approximately 12:45 a.m., the police chief of Oronoco stopped to check a municipal liquor store as part of his normal patrol. The bartender and the waitress told the police chief that appellant Carl James Krause had been in the bar and had threatened his own brother earlier that night. The police chief had known Krause for 15 years and believed…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Coolidge v. New HampshireSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Payton v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Schmerber v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Welsh v. WisconsinSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- United States v. United States District Court for the Eastern District of MichiganSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- State v. MetzCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1988
- Pahlen v. Commissioner of Public SafetyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986
- Pesterfield v. Commissioner of Public SafetyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987
- Pullen v. Commissioner of Public SafetyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987
- Sjodin v. Commissioner of Public SafetyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987