State v. Mazzuca
Idaho Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
PERRY, Chief Judge.
Joseph K. Mazzuca appeals from the district court’s appellate decision which affirmed the magistrate’s denial of Mazzuca’s motion in limine. Mazzuca contends that the magistrate erred when it denied his pretrial motion in limine to exclude the breathalyser test results for lack of foundation. We affirm.
I
FACTS AND PROCEDURE
A Coeur d’Alene police officer arrested Mazzuca, believing him to be driving under the influence of alcohol (DUI). The officer transported Mazzuca to the police station and administered the Intoxilyzer 5000 breathalyser test. The officer instructed Mazzuca…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- State v. BowmanIdaho Court of Appeals · 1993
- State v. GarrettIdaho Supreme Court · 1991
- State v. HartwigIdaho Court of Appeals · 1987
- People v. DeMarasseNew York Court of Appeals · 1995
- State v. BellIdaho Court of Appeals · 1988
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- State v. McIntyreNebraska Supreme Court · 2015
- State v. HealyIdaho Court of Appeals · 2011
- State v. Wilbert LonghoferIdaho Court of Appeals · 2017
- Commonwealth v. DavisKentucky Supreme Court · 2000
- State of Idaho v. Robert AndersonIdaho Court of Appeals · 2007
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.