Legal Opinion

Theodore C. Ruark and Charles W. Ferguson v. Harry C. Tinsley, Warden of the Colorado State Prison

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided August 3, 1965No. 8061PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

This is an appeal from an order denying an application for a writ of habeas corpus. Both Ferguson and Ruark, hereinafter referred to collectively as petitioners, are confined in the Colorado State Penitentiary under sentences imposed by a Colorado state court. Ferguson was sentenced on a plea of guilty and Ruark on a verdict of guilty.

Prior to their conviction, the petitioners filed an application in the Colorado Supreme Court for a writ of prohibition to prevent the prosecution of the state criminal charges. It was denied and a petition for certiorari to review the decision was also denied…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Vanderhoof v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1963
  2. Stewart v. TinsleySupreme Court of Colorado · 1965
  3. Jere Lane Henry v. Harry C. Tinsley, Warden, Colorado State PenitentiaryCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1965
  4. Frank Edward Sepulveda v. The State of ColoradoCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1964
  5. Vernon Sides v. Harry C. Tinsley, Warden, Colorado State PenitentiaryCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1964

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. People v. ShermanColorado Court of Appeals · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API