Legal Opinion

Coors v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided February 22, 1978No. 73-75PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Per curiam

This case comes before the court on

defendant’s exceptions to the recommended decision of Trial Judge Thomas J. Lydon, filed February 10, 1977, pursuant to Rule 134(h), having been submitted on the briefs and oral argument of counsel. Upon consideration thereof, since the court agrees with the trial judge’s recommended decision, as hereinafter set forth*, it hereby affirms and adopts the decision as the basis for the judgment in this case. It is, therefore, concluded that plaintiffs are entitled to recover, including appropriate interest as provided by law, and judgment is entered to that…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Deputy, Administratrix v. Du PontSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
  2. Jack E. Golsen and Sylvia H. Golsen v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1971
  3. Knetsch v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
  4. Old Colony Railroad v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  5. Kapel Goldstein and Tillie Goldstein v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1966

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Internal Revenue Service v. CM Holdings, Inc. (In Re CM Holdings, Inc.)District Court, D. Delaware · 2000
  2. Minnis v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1979
  3. American Electric Power, Inc. v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2001
  4. Salem Financial, Inc. Ex Rel. Branch Investments LLC v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2015
  5. Internal Revenue Service v. CM Holdings, Inc. (In Re CM Holdings, Inc.)District Court, D. Delaware · 1998

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API