Legal Opinion
James Frazee Milling Co. v. State
New York Court of Claims
Decided March 15, 1924No. Claims Nos. 10007 and 17194PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Frederick Collin, Official Referee.
The action is upon two several claims. Each claim is based upon the acts of the state relating to the construction of the Barge canal at Baldwinsville and vicinity. The defendant does not interpose the question concerning the jurisdiction of the court to hear and determine upon the merits, in the action, items or elements of claims embraced in the two claims, whether they be considered as claims for appropriations or claims for damages for the invasion of property rights. For the purposes of the decision the claims can be treated as a single claim. The…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Shively v. BowlbySupreme Court of the United States · 1894
- United States v. Chandler-Dunbar Water Power Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1913
- Economy Light & Power Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
- Huse v. GloverSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
- Fulton L., H. P. Co. v. . State of N.Y.New York Court of Appeals · 1911
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Adirondack League Club, Inc. v. Sierra ClubNew York Court of Appeals · 1998
- Hitchings v. Del Rio Woods Recreation & Park DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976
- National Cellulose Corp. v. State of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1944
- Adirondack League Club, Inc. v. Sierra ClubNew York Court of Appeals · 1998
- California Co. v. PriceSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1954
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.