Meyer Bros. Drug Co. v. Durham

JAMES, Chief Justice.

The question involved was whether or not a sale of a stock of goods by Overton & Sons to B. L. Durham was fraudulent as to creditors.

The first assignment of error is. that the court erred in submitting the issue of fraudulent sale, the testimony conclusively showing that it -was such. The second is that the court erred in refusing to set aside the verdict in favor of defendant, for the same reason. The tenth is that the verdict should have been set aside as against the great preponderance of the evidence.

In view of the verdict we conclude that the evidence was not such as…