Sanger Bros. v. Colbert
Texas Supreme Court
Ho statement is necessary.
1Opinion of the Court
HEBBT, Associate Justice.
— This was a suit for the trial of the right of property. The property having been levied upon by virtue of a writ of attachment sued out by the appellants against their debtor J. B. Dyess, Colbert, the appellee, claimed it, and the issue was as to whether or not a sale made of it to him by the debtor was fraudulent. The evidence showed that Dyess was a merchant, and that the debts of plaintiffs accrued before the sale by Dyess, the debtor, to Colbert, the claimant; that the writs of attachment were regularly issued and levied in the respective suits of plaintiffs…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Tillman v. HellerTexas Supreme Court · 1890
- Sparks v. DawsonTexas Supreme Court · 1877
- Black v. VaughanTexas Supreme Court · 1888
3Cited by31 opinions
- Miskimmins v. ShaverWyoming Supreme Court · 1899
- Williams Chastain v. LairdCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1930
- Ferguson v. Little Rock Trust Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1911
- Finn and Wife v. Krut, Alias LinstromCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1896
- McGriff v. HazleCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1947
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.