Legal Opinion

Sanger Bros. v. Colbert

Texas Supreme Court

Decided May 20, 1892No. 7518PublishedCited by 31 opinions

Ho statement is necessary.

1Opinion of the Court

HEBBT, Associate Justice.

— This was a suit for the trial of the right of property. The property having been levied upon by virtue of a writ of attachment sued out by the appellants against their debtor J. B. Dyess, Colbert, the appellee, claimed it, and the issue was as to whether or not a sale made of it to him by the debtor was fraudulent. The evidence showed that Dyess was a merchant, and that the debts of plaintiffs accrued before the sale by Dyess, the debtor, to Colbert, the claimant; that the writs of attachment were regularly issued and levied in the respective suits of plaintiffs…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Tillman v. HellerTexas Supreme Court · 1890
  2. Sparks v. DawsonTexas Supreme Court · 1877
  3. Black v. VaughanTexas Supreme Court · 1888

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Miskimmins v. ShaverWyoming Supreme Court · 1899
  2. Williams Chastain v. LairdCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1930
  3. Ferguson v. Little Rock Trust Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1911
  4. Finn and Wife v. Krut, Alias LinstromCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1896
  5. McGriff v. HazleCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1947

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API