Legal Opinion

Moore v. Townshend

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided February 15, 1869PublishedCited by 5 opinions

On rule to show cause, &c. This was an action on the case in the nature of waste, to recover carnages for permissive waste, tried at the Cumberland Circuit.

Read the full summary

On rule to show cause, &c. This was an action on the case in the nature of waste, to recover carnages for permissive waste, tried at the Cumberland Circuit. The plaintiff, on the 5th of November, 1853, by a lease, under seal, demised to the defendant the premises known as The Eagle Glass Works, in the county of Cumberland, together with one hundred and fifty moulds, and all the tools of every description connected with the glass manufactory business at that manufactory; to hold for the term of two years and eight months, at a yearly rent of one thousand dollars. The lease contained a…

1Opinion of the CourtDepue, J.

The action on the case, in the nature of waste, has almost entirely superseded the common law action of waste, as well for permissive as for voluntary waste, as furnishing a more easy and expeditious remedy than a writ of waste. It is also an action encouraged by the courts, the recovery being confined to single damages, and not being accompanied by a forfeiture of the place wasted.

At common law, waste lay against a tenant in dower, tenant by the curtesy and guardian in chivalry, but not against lessees for life or years. 2 Inst. 299, 305; Co. Litt. 54. The reason of this diversity was, that…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. Davis v. BondCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1940
  2. Matteson v. WalshMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2011
  3. Fox v. Warner Bros. Pictures, Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 1950
  4. Lefeber v. GoldinNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1952
  5. Crewe Corp. v. FeilerSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1958

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API