Legal Opinion
Stanley Steinert v. United States District Court for the District of Nevada
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided October 1, 1976No. 76-2307PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
JAMES M. CARTER, Circuit Judge:
This is a petition for a writ of mandamus to quash an order for removal. We deny the petition.
FACTS
Petitioner Steinert has been under investigation by the Internal Revenue Service for several years. In 1975, Steinert was ordered by the District Court for the Eastern District of California to appear before an I.R.S. agent. He failed to do so.
A complaint was then issued by the United States Attorney charging Steinert with violating 18 U.S.C. § 401 (criminal contempt) for his failure to comply with the court’s order. However, the complaint erroneously cited § 402…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Green v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- United States v. Joseph S. BukowskiCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1970
- United States v. Frank Ernest LeyvaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1975
- William H. De Parcq v. The United States District Court for Southern District of Iowa and the Honorable William F. Riley, as Judge ThereofCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1956
- United States v. Albert B. SnyderCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1970
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- United States v. Jo Ann WilliamsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1980
- United States v. Clarence S. Armstrong, William John Williams, and Vincent SammarcoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- United States v. Jack Gordon, United States of America v. Joseph DalyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981
- United States v. Louis MoralesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1977
- United States v. MohsenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.