United States v. Clarence S. Armstrong, William John Williams, and Vincent Sammarco
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
POOLE, Circuit Judge:
In October 1981, appellants were subpoenaed to appear before a special federal grand jury investigating possible skimming or diversion of funds from casino properties owned by Trans-Sterling, Inc., where they were supervisors. The scheduled appearances were postponed to permit resolution by the district court of appellants’ motions for disclosure of electronic surveil*702lance pursuant to Gelbard v. United States, 408 U.S. 41, 92 S.Ct. 2357, 33 L.Ed.2d 179 (1972). Judge Harry Claiborne denied those motions in April 1982, and subsequently signed immunity and compulsion orders…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- United States v. United Mine Workers of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Stirone v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
- United States v. DionisioSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Shillitani v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Maness v. MeyersSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by46 opinions
- In Re Homer G. Walters and Evolene Walters, Debtors. Charles L. Burd v. Homer G. Walters and Evolene WaltersCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1989
- United States v. Aleksandrs v. LaurinsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
- Shell Offshore Inc. v. Greenpeace, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016
- National Labor Relations Board v. A-Plus Roofing, Inc. Phyllis WessonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
- United States v. George ReminiCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1992
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.