Legal Opinion

(SS) Smith v. Commissioner of Social Security

District Court, E.D. California

Decided March 28, 2025No. 2:24-cv-00144Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 ROSA DELPHINE SMITH, No. 2:24-cv-00144-SCR 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER 14 LELAND DUDEK, Acting Commissioner of Social Security,1 15 Defendant. 16 17 18 Plaintiff seeks judicial review of a final decision of the Commissioner of Social Security 19 (“Commissioner”), denying her application for disability insurance benefits (“DIB”) under Title 20 II of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. § 401-34, and supplemental security income (“SSI”) 21 under Title XVI of the Social Security Act…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Biestek v. BerryhillSupreme Court of the United States · 2019
  2. Bowen v. YuckertSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  3. Molina v. AstrueCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
  4. Maureen Thomas v. Jo Anne Barnhart, Commissioner of the Social Security AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
  5. Deborah L. Burch v. Jo Anne B. Barnhart, Commissioner of Social SecurityCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API