Legal Opinion
Sutherland v. City of New York
New York Court of Appeals
Decided November 12, 1985PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Order affirmed, with costs, and question certified answered in the affirmative. We interpret the question certified as asking whether the Appellate Division had the power to reinstate the natural parent as guardian ad litem. We conclude that it had that power, and pass on no other issue (Herrick v Second Cuthouse, 64 NY2d 692; Brady v Ottaway Newspapers, 63 NY2d 1031).
Concur: Chief Judge Wachtler and Judges Jasen, Kaye, Alexander and Titone. Taking no part: Judges Meyer and Simons.
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Brady v. Ottaway Newspapers, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1984
- Herrick v. Second Cuthouse, Ltd.New York Court of Appeals · 1984
3Cited by10 opinions
- Stahl v. RheeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
- In re the Estate of BetzAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
- Mazzuca v. Warren P. Wielt TrustAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
- New York City Housing Authority v. HartCivil Court of the City of New York · 1990
- Reed v. Tompkins Terrace, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.