Legal Opinion

City of Bristol v. Dickau Bus Co.

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided June 19, 2001No. AC 20130PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

LAVERY, C. J.

The defendant, Dickau Bus Company, Inc., appeals from the judgment of the trial court ordering it to indemnify the plaintiffs1 for moneys expended by them in settling lawsuits arising from an accident involving one of the defendant’s school buses. On appeal, the defendant claims that the trial court improperly applied common-law principles concerning active versus passive negligence (1) in the absence of a judicial finding of negligence by the plaintiffs and (2) when any negligence on the plaintiffs’ part would have been premised on their own acts, unrelated to the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Kaplan v. Merberg Wrecking CorporationSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1965
  2. Black v. Goodwin, Loomis & Britton, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1996
  3. Duni v. United Technologies Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1996
  4. Crotta v. Home Depot, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1999
  5. Hammond v. City of WaterburySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Chicago Title Ins. Co. v. Accurate Title Searches, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2017
  2. Pouliot v. Paul Arpin Van Lines, Inc.District Court, D. Connecticut · 2005
  3. Pellecchia v. Connecticut Light & Power Co.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2012
  4. Randazzo v. SakonConnecticut Appellate Court · 2018
  5. Burgess v. Colley, No. 0063746 (Mar. 4, 2002)Connecticut Superior Court · 2002

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API