Legal Opinion

Hammond v. City of Waterbury

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided July 16, 1991No. 14099PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCovello, J.

This is an appeal from a judgment of the trial court, following a jury trial awarding the defendant, the city of Waterbury (city), damages by way of indemnification from the third party defendant, Mattatuck Beef Company (Mattatuck), and its driver, the third party defendant Robert Adamovicia, for sums the city paid in settlement of a liability claim arising out of the death of Joseph Hammond. The issues on appeal are whether: (1) a claim for indemnification can be based upon the secondary tortfeasor’s stipulated judgment with the injured party; (2) the requirements for a cause of action for…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Kaplan v. Merberg Wrecking CorporationSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1965
  2. Peck v. JacqueminSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
  3. International Brotherhood of Teamsters of America v. ShapiroSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1951
  4. Seals v. HickeySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
  5. Winslow v. Zoning BoardSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1956

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Daley v. Aetna Life & Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1999
  2. Elliott v. City of WaterburySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1998
  3. Viera v. CohenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2007
  4. OBG Technical Services, Inc. v. Northrop Grumman Space & Mission Systems Corp. Ex Rel. TRW, Inc.District Court, D. Connecticut · 2007
  5. Emerick v. KuhnConnecticut Appellate Court · 1999

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API