Legal Opinion

Dimambro-Northend Associates v. United Construction, Inc

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided September 8, 1986No. Docket 83545PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDanhof, C.J.

Defendants United Construction, Inc., and Mancini Construction, Inc., a joint venture (United/Mancini), appeal as of right from the November 5, 1985, opinion and order of the Wayne Circuit Court in this construction contract case.

We agree with United/Mancini that the circuit court erroneously interpreted the comprehensive general liability insurance policy between United/ Mancini and its insurer, Admiral Insurance Company, third-party defendant. We reverse the opinion and order with respect to the circuit court’s decision on the issue of insurance coverage provided by Admiral and remand for…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Stine v. Continental Casualty Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Eghotz v. CreechMichigan Supreme Court · 1962
  3. Edgar's Warehouse, Inc. v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1965
  4. Western Casualty & Surety Group v. Coloma TownshipMichigan Court of Appeals · 1985
  5. Lowenstein Dyes & Cosmetics, Inc. v. Aetna Life & Casualty Co.District Court, E.D. New York · 1981

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Allstate Insurance v. FreemanMichigan Supreme Court · 1989
  2. Arco Industries Corp. v. American Motorists InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1995
  3. Northland Insurance Company v. Guardsman Products, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1998
  4. Fragner v. American Community Mutual InsuranceMichigan Court of Appeals · 1993
  5. Nucor Corp. v. Employers InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2012

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API