Legal Opinion
State v. Quesnel
Supreme Court of Vermont
Decided February 2, 1965No. 68PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtKeyser, J.
The respondent is informed against for fraud under 13 V.S.A. §2002 resulting on trial in a verdict of guilty and appeal by respondent. The questions for decision are the sufficiency of the information and error in the charge of the court.
The information as far as material charged that the respondent—
“did then and there with force and arms feloniously and designedly by false pretenses obtain from one Robert J. Kemp, the signature of said Robert J. Kemp to a written instrument, the false making whereof would be punishable as forgery, said written instrument being, to wit, a form note of the…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- State v. GoyetSupreme Court of Vermont · 1957
- State v. CoburnSupreme Court of Vermont · 1960
- Ryder v. Vermont Last Block Co.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1917
- State v. DonaluzziSupreme Court of Vermont · 1920
- State v. BrissonSupreme Court of Vermont · 1955
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- State v. MorrillSupreme Court of Vermont · 1969
- State v. KasperSupreme Court of Vermont · 1979
- State v. KerrSupreme Court of Vermont · 1983
- State v. BruceSupreme Court of Vermont · 1967
- Kinney v. CloutierSupreme Court of Vermont · 1965
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.