State v. Donaluzzi
Supreme Court of Vermont
Complaint for illegally selling and furnishing intoxicating liquor. Plea, not guilty. Trial by jury in the Barre City Court, Erwin M. Harvey, Acting Judge. Yerdict, guilty. Judgment on the verdict. The respondent excepted. The opinion states the case.
1Opinion of the CourtTaylor, J.
This is a complaint charging that the respond- • ent, at Northfield in the county of Washington, on the first day of June, 1919, “not then and there being a licensee, and not then and there having a license to sell intoxicating liquor, did sell and furnish intoxicating liquor without authority, contrary to the form of the statute,” etc. The respondent was convicted on a jury trial, followed by judgment and sentence. She brings the case here on two exceptions.
The transaction on which the State relied for a conviction was had with one Benjamin L. Davis. He was called as a witness by the State…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- People v. JenningsIllinois Supreme Court · 1911
- State v. WardSupreme Court of Vermont · 1888
- State v. BridgmanSupreme Court of Vermont · 1876
- Jaynes v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1908
- Kahn v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1914
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- United States v. Martha L. WoodsCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1973
- State v. CatsamSupreme Court of Vermont · 1987
- Higgins, Admr. v. MetzgerSupreme Court of Vermont · 1928
- State v. StacySupreme Court of Vermont · 1932
- State v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Vermont · 1920
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.