Legal Opinion

True v. Brainard

New York Supreme Court

Decided June 15, 1927PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Dowling, William F., J.

On March 1, 1913, the defendant made and delivered to plaintiff’s testator the following promissory note:

“ 5527.07 Syracuse, N. Y., March 1, 1913.
“ For value received I promise to pay to Ransom B. True the sum of five thousand five hundred and twenty-seven & 07 /100 dollars with interest at five per cent (5%) payable in monthly installments of one hundred dollars ($100.00) each on the last day of each month. « GE0_ R BRAINARD.”

Nothing was paid upon the note, either of principal or interest. Action was begun to collect the note April 13, 1922. Issue was not joined until…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Erickson v. . MacYNew York Court of Appeals · 1921
  2. Tucker v. RandallMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1807
  3. Quackenbush v. MapesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1908
  4. Purdy v. . PhilipsNew York Court of Appeals · 1854
  5. Burnham v. BrownSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1844

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Libeson v. Copy Realty Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
  2. Liggio v. LiggioAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1976
  3. Prouty v. DrakeNew York Supreme Court · 1959
  4. Arkport State Bank v. NutterAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1951
  5. In re the Estate of PhilippeNew York Surrogate's Court · 1961

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API