Bateman v. Bateman
Supreme Court of Georgia
1Dissent
Duckworth, Chief Justice,
dissenting. 1. We should understand the meaning of Code § 74-105 at the outset. It provides that until majority it is the duty of the father to provide for the maintenance, protection and education of his child. In Bd. of Ed. of Cartersville v. Purse, 101 Ga. 422 (28 SE 896) at page 433, it is recognized that the father has a duty to educate his child, but it is there pointed out that neither at common law nor by any Georgia statute is provision made to compel the father to do so. If Code § 74-105 imposes an enforceable duty to educate until the age of 21 why enact…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Glendinning v. McComasSupreme Court of Georgia · 1939
- Board of Education v. PurseSupreme Court of Georgia · 1897
- McAlhany v. AllenSupreme Court of Georgia · 1942
- Adams v. AdamsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1958
- Hooten v. HootenSupreme Court of Georgia · 1929
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.