Legal Opinion
Kroencke v. General Motors Corp.
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided May 28, 2004No. 03-7839PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SUMMARY ORDER
ON CONSIDERATION WHEREOF, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that the District Court’s order be AFFIRMED.
On July 10, 2003, the district court issued a written decision granting defendants’ motion for summary judgment. Reviewing de novo the district court’s grant of summary judgment, see Fred Ahlert Music Corp. v. Warner/Chappell Music, Inc., 155 F.3d 17, 21 (2d Cir.1998), we find that the works at issue are not substantially similar. See Langman Fabrics v. Graff Californiawear, Inc., 160 F.3d 106, 116 (2d Cir.1998). The total look and feel of defendants’ advertisement…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Langman Fabrics v. Graff Californiawear, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1998
- Tufenkian Import/Export Ventures, Inc. v. Einstein Moomjy, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2003
- Fred Ahlert Music Corp. v. Warner/Chappell Music, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1998
3Cited by2 opinions
- Dean v. CameronDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2014
- Hayuk v. Starbucks Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 2016