Legal Opinion

Hayuk v. Starbucks Corp.

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided January 12, 2016No. 15CV4887-LTSPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MeMQRANDuM OPINION AND ORDER

LAURA TAYLOR SWAIN, United States District Judge

Maya Hayuk (“Plaintiff’) brings suit against Starbucks Corporation (“Starbucks”) and 72andSunny Partners, LLC (“72andSunny,” together with Starbucks, “Defendants”), asserting five claims of copyright infringement against each Defendant and an additional claim of contributory infringement against 72andSunny. Plaintiff alleges that Starbucks’ Frappucci-no advertising campaign infringed upon her copyrighted art works. Defendants have moved to dismiss the Complaint, arguing that, as a matter of law, Defendants’ allegedly…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Feist Publications, Inc. v. Rural Telephone Service Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
  2. Knitwaves, Inc., Plaintiff-Appellee-Cross-Appellant v. Lollytogs Ltd. (Inc.) D/B/A French Toast, Defendant-Appellant-Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1995
  3. Peter F. Gaito Architecture, LLC v. Simone Development Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2010
  4. Streetwise Maps, Inc. v. Vandam, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1998
  5. Williams v. CrichtonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1996

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Automated Management Systems, Inc. v. Rappaport Hertz Cherson Rosenthal, P.C.District Court, S.D. New York · 2022
  2. Klauber Brothers, Inc. v. WW, LLCDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2019
  3. Tangle Inc. v. Aritzia, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API