State v. Wright
Ohio Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtFain, J.
Defendant-appellant Cedric Wright appeals from the denial of his motion for a new trial, based upon newly-discovered evidence. Wright submitted an affidavit from one of the witnesses against him at trial, in which the witness recanted his testimony. The affidavit was accompanied by a letter from the witness, to the trial judge, stating that: "Cedric Wright did not know until this date, July 3,1989 that I was going to make a notarized statement, and the contents of that statement."
The trial court denied Wright's motion for a new trial, without a hearing, upon the grounds that Wright had failed…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- State v. PetroOhio Supreme Court · 1947
- City of Dayton v. MartinOhio Court of Appeals · 1987
- State v. ArvanitisOhio Court of Appeals · 1986
- Graines v. FleeterOhio Court of Appeals · 1985
- State v. EubankOhio Court of Appeals · 1987
3Cited by29 opinions
- State v. JohnsonOhio Supreme Court · 2024
- State v. CondonOhio Court of Appeals · 2004
- State v. MorrisOhio Court of Appeals · 2017
- State v. Bush, 08ap-627 (2-3-2009)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2009
- State v. QuinnOhio Court of Appeals · 2016
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.