Legal Opinion
Wyandot Nation of Kansas v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided April 8, 2014No. 1:06-cv-00919PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
WOLSKI, Judge.
This ease is before the Court on defendant’s motion to dismiss for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction, pursuant to Rule 12(b)(1) of the Rules of the United States Court of Federal Claims. The government argues that the pendency of a previously filed case in a United States district court precludes our jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1500. The motion has been fully briefed and oral argument was heard. For the reasons that follow, defendant’s motion is GRANTED.
I. BACKGROUND †
On December 28, 2006, plaintiff, Wyandot Nation of Kansas (Wyandot Nation), brought a…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Keene Corp. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Trusted Integration, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2011
- United States v. Tohono O’odham NationSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
- Johns-Manville Corporation and Johns-Manville Sales Corporation v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988
- Bonnie Harbuck v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2004
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Acetris Health, LLC v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2018