Legal Opinion

Strauss Veal Feeds, Inc. v. Mead & Hunt, Inc.

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided May 30, 1989No. 43A03-8809-CV-285PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOFFMAN, Judge.

Plaintiffs-appellants Strauss Veal Feeds, Inc., Strauss Veal, Inc. and Provimi, Inc. (hereinafter referred to as "Strauss") appeal from a trial court decision in favor of defendant-appellee Mead and Hunt, Inc. (hereinafter referred to as "M & H") in a suit for breach of contract and negligence. The facts relevant to this appeal are summarized below.

M & H is an architectural and engineering firm which specializes in designs for the dairy industry. In February of 1984, M & H learned of a proposed veal feed processing facility to be constructed in North Manchester, Indiana. The…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Walters v. Kellam & Foley, Mussett, Nicholas & Stevenson, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1977
  2. Ethyl Corp. v. Forcum-Lannom Associates, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1982
  3. RR Donnelley & Sons v. Henry-Williams, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1981
  4. Lukowski v. Vecta Educational Corp.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1980
  5. Potts v. OffuttIndiana Court of Appeals · 1985

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Indianapolis-Marion County Public Library v. Charlier Clark & Linard, P.C.Indiana Supreme Court · 2010
  2. South Eastern Indiana Natural Gas Co. v. IngramIndiana Court of Appeals · 1993
  3. In Re Greenwood Air CrashDistrict Court, S.D. Indiana · 1995
  4. In Re Greenwood Air CrashDistrict Court, S.D. Indiana · 1995
  5. Samos Imex Corp. v. Nextel Communications, Inc.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1998

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API