Legal Opinion
Samos Imex Corp. v. Nextel Communications, Inc.
District Court, D. Massachusetts
Decided September 29, 1998No. Civ.A. 97-11248-WGYPublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
YOUNG, District Judge.
INTRODUCTION
Samos Imex Corp. filed this tort action against the defendant, Nextel Communications, Inc. (“Nextel”), alleging injury to its building as a consequence of Nextel’s erecting a cellular telephone monopole nearby. Nextel, in turn, filed a third-party complaint for indemnification and contribution against the three parties with whom it contracted with to perform work in connection with the installation of the monopole: Brook Hill Enterprises, Inc. (“Brook Hill”), Edwards & Kelcey, Inc. (“Edwards & Kelcey”), and Val-mont Industries Inc. (‘Valmont”). At…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Arthur Araujo v. Woods Hole, Martha's Vineyard, Nantucket Steamship Authority v. New England Telephone Co., Third-PartyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1982
- Liberty Mutual Insurance v. WesterlindMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1978
- Monadnock Display Fireworks, Inc. v. Town of AndoverMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1983
- Herson v. New Boston Garden Corp.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 1996
- Fall River Hous. Auth. v. HV COLLINS CAPE COD LATHMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1992
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Liberty Mutual Insurance v. Digitas, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2024
- Coons v. A.F. Chapman Corp.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2006
- In re CorbettUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Massachusetts · 2016
- Steffen v. VIKING CORP.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2006