Legal Opinion · Dissent

Knox City v. Motor Inv. Co.

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided January 22, 1943No. 13360Published

1DissentYoung, Justice

I disagree with the majority holding that under Article 1436 — 1, P.C. (Motors Vehicle Act), a municipality purchasing a motor vehicle in total disregard of the Act, acquires superior rights over a subsequent mortgagee who has fully complied with the Act in fixing his lien. As stated by Chief Justice BOND,' the record facts are undisputed; however, a further detail thereof is necessary: On March 6, 1940, the truck chassis in question (which R. M. Hedrick later assembled into a fire truck and made the subject of contract with Knox City) was sold by Ford Motor Company to Boling-Duggan, local…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Commercial Credit Co. v. American Mfg. Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1941
  2. Elder Chevrolet Co. v. Bailey County Motor Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1941
  3. Parma v. First Nat. Bank of CameronTexas Commission of Appeals · 1933
  4. Sackenreuther v. WinstonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1940
  5. Yeager v. Laredo Nat. BankCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1940

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API