Legal Opinion

Jerome County Ex Rel. Board of Commissioners v. Holloway

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided October 25, 1990No. 18167PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McDEVITT, Justice.

The Jerome County zoning ordinance in question was adopted in December of 1984. Subsequently, the County Commissioners held a public hearing to get public reaction to the ordinance. Pursuant to this hearing, the Commissioners decided that amendment of some of the ordinance’s provisions would be required. On January 31, 1985, the County Commissioners published a notice of hearing, which stated that a hearing would be held to consider certain proposed amendments. The notice stated the purpose, time and place of the hearing, but it did not include the proposed amendments.…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Hurst v. City of BurlingameCalifornia Supreme Court · 1929
  2. Hart v. Bayless Investment & Trading CompanyArizona Supreme Court · 1959
  3. Holly Development, Inc. v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Colorado · 1959
  4. Gordon Paving Co. v. Blaine County Board of County CommissionersIdaho Supreme Court · 1977
  5. Citizens for Better Government v. County of ValleyIdaho Supreme Court · 1973

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Castaneda v. Brighton Corp.Idaho Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Friends of Minidoka v. Jerome CountyIdaho Supreme Court · 2012
  3. Foster v. City of St. AnthonyIdaho Supreme Court · 1992
  4. White v. Bannock County CommissionersIdaho Supreme Court · 2003
  5. McCuskey v. Canyon CountyIdaho Supreme Court · 1993

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API