Legal Opinion
In Re Elegant Concepts, Ltd.
United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. New York
Decided December 15, 1986No. 1-19-40591PublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
CECELIA H. GOETZ, Bankruptcy Judge:
Before the Court is a motion identified as “pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 362(h),” made by the Chapter 11 debtor, Elegant Concepts, Ltd. (“Elegant” or “the debtor”), against John C. Dougherty and Susan E. O’Grady-Dougherty (“respondents”). The debtor seeks an order finding a deliberate violation by the respondents of the automatic stay provision of 11 U.S.C. § 362(a), and requests an award of costs, attorney’s fees and punitive damages, along with a certification of contempt by this Court to the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Northern Pipeline Construction Co. v. Marathon Pipe Line Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Thomas v. Union Carbide Agricultural Products Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Commodity Futures Trading Commission v. SchorSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Continental Air Lines, Inc. v. Hillblom (In Re Continental Air Lines, Inc.)District Court, S.D. Texas · 1986
- Better Homes of Virginia, Inc. v. Budget Service Co. (In Re Better Homes of Virginia, Inc.)District Court, E.D. Virginia · 1985
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Pemstein v. StimpsonMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1994
- United States Lines, Inc. v. GAC Marine Fuels Ltd. (In Re McLean Industries, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 1986
- Utah State Credit Union v. Skinner (In Re Skinner)District Court, D. Utah · 1988
- Fortune & Faal v. Zumbrun (In Re Zumbrun)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
- Halas v. PlatekDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1999
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.