Legal Opinion

ALEXANDER v. COMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided October 4, 2022No. 2:22-cv-00269Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA DANIEL PHILLIP ALEXANDER, : : Plaintiff, : CIVIL ACTION : v. : No. 22-269 : COMMISSIONER OF THE : SOCIAL SECURITY : ADMINISTRATION, : : Defendant. : MEMORANDUM OPINION PAMELA A. CARLOS October 4, 2022 U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE Daniel Phillip Alexander seeks review, pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), of the Commissioner of Social Security’s (“Commissioner”) decision denying his claim for Supplemental Security Income (“SSI”).1 For the reasons that follow, Mr. Alexander’s Request for Review is denied. I. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Richardson v. PeralesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Pierce v. UnderwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  3. Ethel Burnett v. Commissioner of Social Security AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2000
  4. Joyce A. Rutherford v. Jo Anne B. Barnhart, Commissioner of the Social Security AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2005
  5. Tommaso Fargnoli v. Larry G. Massanari, Commissioner, Social Security AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2001

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API