Legal Opinion

City of Port Tampa v. County of Hillsborough

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided September 19, 1931PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWhitpield, P.J.

— The City brought assumpsit against the county for funds collected by the county during a period of years to “be turned over to” the city pursuant to the following statute:

“The board of county commissioners are hereby authorized and required to levy a tax of not to exceed five mills on a dollar on all property in said county each year for road and bridge purposes, and the same, when collected, shall be paid over to the county depository and kept in a separate fund, which fund shall not be expended for any other purpose than for work on the public roads and bridges in the several counties,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. City of Chadron v. Dawes CountyNebraska Supreme Court · 1908
  2. City of Crawford v. DarrowNebraska Supreme Court · 1910
  3. City of Albion v. Boone CountyNebraska Supreme Court · 1913
  4. Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co. v. Hall's Admr.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1912

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. City of Stuart v. GreenSupreme Court of Florida · 1945
  2. Glades County v. GreenSupreme Court of Florida · 1963
  3. City of Stuart v. GreenSupreme Court of Florida · 1945
  4. Ideal Farms Drainage District v. Certain LandsSupreme Court of Florida · 1944

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API