Legal Opinion
City of Port Tampa v. County of Hillsborough
Supreme Court of Florida
Decided September 19, 1931PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtWhitpield, P.J.
— The City brought assumpsit against the county for funds collected by the county during a period of years to “be turned over to” the city pursuant to the following statute:
“The board of county commissioners are hereby authorized and required to levy a tax of not to exceed five mills on a dollar on all property in said county each year for road and bridge purposes, and the same, when collected, shall be paid over to the county depository and kept in a separate fund, which fund shall not be expended for any other purpose than for work on the public roads and bridges in the several counties,…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- City of Chadron v. Dawes CountyNebraska Supreme Court · 1908
- City of Crawford v. DarrowNebraska Supreme Court · 1910
- City of Albion v. Boone CountyNebraska Supreme Court · 1913
- Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co. v. Hall's Admr.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1912
3Cited by4 opinions
- City of Stuart v. GreenSupreme Court of Florida · 1945
- Glades County v. GreenSupreme Court of Florida · 1963
- City of Stuart v. GreenSupreme Court of Florida · 1945
- Ideal Farms Drainage District v. Certain LandsSupreme Court of Florida · 1944