Legal Opinion

Pearson v. Lake Lawrence Pulpwood Co.

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided December 8, 1969No. 5-5039PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Frank Holt, Justice.

The appellants, the widow and dependent children of Robert Olen Pearson, are claimants for workmen’s compensation benefits. The referee and the full commission found that the decedent was not an employee of appellee Lake Lawrence Pulpwood Company and denied compensation. The circuit court affirmed the commission’s action.

On appeal appellants first contend that the decedent was an employee of the appellee pulpwood company. Although we are committed to the well established rule that we liberally construe the provisions of the Workmen’s Compensation Act in favor of the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Herman Wilson Lumber Co. v. HughesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1968
  2. Hollingsworth & Frazier v. BarnettSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1956
  3. McCollum v. RogersSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1964
  4. Stillman v. Jim Walter CorporationSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1963
  5. Hale v. Mansfield Lbr. Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1964

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Voss v. Ward's Pulpwood YardSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1970
  2. Hollingsworth v. EvansSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1973
  3. Dallas County Pulpwood Co. v. StrangeSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1975

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API