Stillman v. Jim Walter Corporation
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Opinion of the Court
ROBINSON, Justice.
On August 13, 1959, appellant, Roy Still-man, and appellee, Jim Walter Corporation, entered into a written contract, Jim Walter Corporation being designated as “contractor” and appellant, Roy Stillman, designated as “sub-contractor”, whereby the Jim Walter Corporation engaged Stillman to build houses for a specified consideration, the amount of the consideration depending on the type of house constructed. Stillman was to furnish only the labor.
Item 5 of the contract provides: “SubContractor shall furnish Contractor a Certificate of Workmen’s Compensation coverage on…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Ozan Lumber Company v. McNeelySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1949
- Ham v. Mullins Lumber Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1940
- Carpenter v. MaddenLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1956
- Smith Coal Co. v. FeltnerCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1953
- Hano v. KinchenLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1960
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Voss v. Ward's Pulpwood YardSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1970
- Hale v. Mansfield Lbr. Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1964
- Hollingsworth v. EvansSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1973
- Hughes v. Hooker Bros.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1964
- Franklin v. Arkansas Kraft, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arkansas · 1984
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.