Legal Opinion

Stillman v. Jim Walter Corporation

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided June 3, 1963No. 5-3026PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ROBINSON, Justice.

On August 13, 1959, appellant, Roy Still-man, and appellee, Jim Walter Corporation, entered into a written contract, Jim Walter Corporation being designated as “contractor” and appellant, Roy Stillman, designated as “sub-contractor”, whereby the Jim Walter Corporation engaged Stillman to build houses for a specified consideration, the amount of the consideration depending on the type of house constructed. Stillman was to furnish only the labor.

Item 5 of the contract provides: “SubContractor shall furnish Contractor a Certificate of Workmen’s Compensation coverage on…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Ozan Lumber Company v. McNeelySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1949
  2. Ham v. Mullins Lumber Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1940
  3. Carpenter v. MaddenLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1956
  4. Smith Coal Co. v. FeltnerCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1953
  5. Hano v. KinchenLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1960

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Voss v. Ward's Pulpwood YardSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1970
  2. Hale v. Mansfield Lbr. Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1964
  3. Hollingsworth v. EvansSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1973
  4. Hughes v. Hooker Bros.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1964
  5. Franklin v. Arkansas Kraft, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arkansas · 1984

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API