Legal Opinion

Coberly v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided January 26, 1983No. 925-82PublishedCited by 35 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

2Per curiam

Appeal is taken from a conviction for obscenity. Y.T.C.A., Penal Code, Sec. 43.23. After finding Appellant guilty, the jury assessed punishment at 3 months, probated, and a $2,000 fine. The Court of Appeals reversed Appellant’s conviction. Coberly v. State, 640 S.W.2d 428 (Tex.App.—Ft. Worth 1982). Appellant’s conviction was reversed by the Court of Appeals due to the trial court’s failure to charge the jury on the consequences of a presumption under Y.T.C.A., Penal Code, Sec. 2.05.

In her petition for discretionary review, Appellant raises numerous contentions in which she maintains…

3Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Ex Parte SalfenCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1981
  2. Coberly v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1982

4Cited by35 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Lykos v. FineCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2011
  2. LaPoint v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1988
  3. Briggs v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1987
  4. Skinner v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1983
  5. Hookie v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2004

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API