Legal Opinion

Skinner v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided April 20, 1983No. 839-82PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION ON STATE’S PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW

TEAGUE, Judge.

Willie Ann Skinner, appellant, was convicted of promoting by exhibiting to O.W. Farrell obscene material, namely, a film entitled “Cry For Cindy.”

Appellant originally was found guilty by a jury, which assessed her punishment at a fine of $20.00. After conviction, she was granted a new trial by the trial court because of a defective jury charge. Thereafter, appellant was again tried in a bench trial on a plea of not guilty and stipulated evidence. She was again found guilty and punishment was again assessed at a fine of $20.00.…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Burks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  3. Greene v. MasseySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  4. Griffin v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1981
  5. Goocher v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1982

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Lykos v. FineCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2011
  2. Briggs v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1987
  3. Davis v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1983
  4. Patton v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1986
  5. Hookie v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2004

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API