Legal Opinion

State v. Birchard

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided January 23, 1991No. 89-CF-007; CA A62487PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

After his convictions for attempted murder and attempted robbery in Umatilla County, defendant was convicted and sentenced in Morrow County for attempted murder. He appeals from that judgment. His sentence included a mandatory minimum for the use of a gun, to be served consecutively to the Umatilla County sentences. Although the Umatilla County sentences, including a mandatory gun minimum, had been imposed, they had not been served. See State v. Birchard (A62159/60), 105 Or App 402, 804 P2d 1225 (1991).

The state asserts that the error was not prejudicial, but it concedes that the trial court…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State v. BrownOregon Supreme Court · 1990
  2. State v. HaywoodCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1985
  3. State v. WellsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1986
  4. State v. BirchardCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1991

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. LairdCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2021
  2. State v. BirchardCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API