Legal Opinion

State v. Birchard

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided January 23, 1991No. CF89-25, CF89-26; CA A62159, A62160PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

Defendant was charged and convicted in Umatilla County for attempted murder and attempted first degree robbery. At the sentencing on those convictions, the trial court imposed two mandatory minimum five-year sentences for the use of a gun under ORS 161.610. The state concedes that the trial court erred in imposing the second “gun minimum.” State v. Haywood, 73 Or App 6, 697 P2d 977 (1985). We agree. See State v. Birchard (A62487), 105 Or App 400, 804 P2d 1224 (1991).

Although the sentences imposed were concurrent and no error was preserved, there may be collateral consequences as a result of…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State v. BrownOregon Supreme Court · 1990
  2. State v. HaywoodCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1985
  3. State v. BirchardCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1991

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. State v. BirchardCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API