State v. Fisher
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1DissentN. Patrick Crooks, J.
¶ 66. (dissenting). Because I strongly disagree with the majority's reaffirmation of the constitutionality of Wis. Stat. § 941.23, despite the overwhelming passage of Article I, Section 25 of the Wisconsin Constitution, I respectfully dissent. Although this case presents an as-applied challenge to the constitutionality of § 941.23,1 believe the statute is unconstitutional not only as applied here, but also on its face or per se, since it is contrary to Article I, Section 25. I write separately to reiterate the conclusions set *150forth in my concurrence/dissent in State v. Hamdan, 2003 WI 113,…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Holytz v. City of MilwaukeeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1962
- State v. ColeWisconsin Supreme Court · 2003
- Hellerstein v. Assessor of IslipNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
- State v. MartinWisconsin Supreme Court · 1991
- Pascucci v. VagottSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1976
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.