Ricketts v. Kansas City Stock Yards Co. of Maine
Supreme Court of Missouri
1ConcurrenceFinch, Chief Justice
I concur in the result reached in the principal opinion for the reasons which follow.
The contract of employment was entered into in Missouri. The employer, as he had a right to do, elected to reject the Missouri Workmen’s Compensation Act, but as an incident of that rejection it may not assert as a defense that the employee assumed the risk of injury or that injury was caused in any degree by the employee’s negligence. § 287.080, V.A.M.S. See also § 287.110(2), V.A.M.S.; Moles v. Kansas City Stock Yards Company of Maine, Mo.App., 434 S.W.2d 752.
Since plaintiff’s injury occurred in Kansas, the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Ballard & Ballard Co. v. Lee's Admr.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1909
- Uhlrig v. ShorttSupreme Court of Kansas · 1964
- West v. Cudahy Packing Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1912
- Moles v. Kansas City Stock Yards Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1968
- Piepmeyer v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1970
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.