Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Ricketts v. Kansas City Stock Yards Co. of Maine

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided September 11, 1972No. 55726Published

1ConcurrenceFinch, Chief Justice

I concur in the result reached in the principal opinion for the reasons which follow.

The contract of employment was entered into in Missouri. The employer, as he had a right to do, elected to reject the Missouri Workmen’s Compensation Act, but as an incident of that rejection it may not assert as a defense that the employee assumed the risk of injury or that injury was caused in any degree by the employee’s negligence. § 287.080, V.A.M.S. See also § 287.110(2), V.A.M.S.; Moles v. Kansas City Stock Yards Company of Maine, Mo.App., 434 S.W.2d 752.

Since plaintiff’s injury occurred in Kansas, the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Ballard & Ballard Co. v. Lee's Admr.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1909
  2. Uhlrig v. ShorttSupreme Court of Kansas · 1964
  3. West v. Cudahy Packing Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1912
  4. Moles v. Kansas City Stock Yards Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1968
  5. Piepmeyer v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1970

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API