Legal Opinion · Dissent

Gonzalez v. Schrock Cabinet Co.

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided May 31, 2000No. H96-056; CA A99970Published

1DissentLandau, J.

I disagree with the majority’s disposition of this case for two reasons. First, the majority incorrectly concludes that employer was obligated to seek review of a decision that the enactment of 1995 amendments to the vocational assistance statute had rendered a nullity. The majority, without citation of authority or explanation, simply declines to give effect to the statute. Second, and apart from that, the majority condones the Director’s decision to “toll” a statutory filing deadline. The majority characterizes the Director’s decision as merely “clumsy,” but apparently not legally…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Volk v. America West AirlinesCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1995
  2. Severy v. Board of ParoleOregon Supreme Court · 1993
  3. Schurman v. Bureau of LaborCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1978
  4. Oregon Occupational Safety & Health Division v. Don Whitaker Logging, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API