Legal Opinion

Reynolds v. Crockett Homes, Inc., 08 Co 8 (3-5-2009)

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided March 5, 2009No. 08 CO 8PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

{¶ 1} This timely appeal comes for consideration upon the record in the trial court, the parties' briefs, and their oral arguments before this court. Defendant-Appellant, Crockett Homes, Inc., appeals the decision of the Columbiana County Court of Common Pleas that lifted a stay of proceedings pending arbitration. On appeal, Crockett Homes argues that the arbitration provision was valid and enforceable and, therefore, that the trial court erred when it granted the motion made by Plaintiffs-Appellees, Daniel and Nikki Reynolds, to dispense with the arbitration. The Reynolds counter that…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Taylor Building Corp. of America v. BenfieldOhio Supreme Court · 2008
  2. Collins v. Click Camera & Video, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1993
  3. Eagle v. Fred Martin Motor Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2004
  4. Johnson v. Mobil Oil Corp.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 1976
  5. Neubrander v. Dean Witter Reynolds, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1992

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Riggs v. Patriot Energy Partners, L.L.C.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2014
  2. New Hope Community Church v. Patriot Energy Partners, L.L.C.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2013
  3. French v. Ascent Resources-Utica, L.L.C.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2020
  4. Paradie v. Turning Point Builders, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API