Legal Opinion

Brandmiller v. Arreola

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided March 13, 1996No. 93-2842PublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWilliam A. Bablitch, J.

Brandmiller, et al. (Brandmiller) challenge the constitutionality of various "cruising" ordinances enacted by the municipalities of West Allis, Milwaukee, Greenfield and Hales Corners (the Municipalities). Brandmiller argues that the cruising ordinances are unconstitutional under both the federal and the Wisconsin constitution because they violate the fundamental right to travel and are overbroad. The Municipalities argue that the ordinances do not impinge upon any fundamental right since they are merely traffic regulations. Although we recognize a fundamental right to intrastate travel, we…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Shapiro v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. Kent v. DullesSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  3. Attorney General of New York v. Soto-LopezSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Lutz, David D. v. City of York, PennsylvaniaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1990
  5. Bachowski v. SalamoneWisconsin Supreme Court · 1987

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. Patricia Johnson Michael Au France v. City of CincinnatiCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2003
  2. State v. ColeWisconsin Supreme Court · 2003
  3. Hannemann v. Southern Door County School DistrictCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2012
  4. Ferdon Ex Rel. Petrucelli v. Wisconsin Patients Compensation FundWisconsin Supreme Court · 2005
  5. State v. HamdanWisconsin Supreme Court · 2003

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API