Legal Opinion

Summe v. Gronotte

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided September 9, 2011No. 2010-CA-000055-MRPublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

ACREE, Judge:

The issue before us is whether the Kenton Circuit Court abused its discretion in finding that appellee, Mary Gronotte, Executor of the Estate of Mary C. Wimmers, was qualified as a lay witness to provide opinion testimony as to the value of a parcel of property owned by the estate. Finding no abuse of discretion, we affirm.

I. Facts and Procedure

Gronotte is the executor of the will and estate of her mother, Mary C. Wimmers. The estate includes a parcel of property located at 66 Orphanage Road in Fort Mitchell, Kentucky (the “Wimmers Property”). The appellant, Mark Summe,…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
  2. Commonwealth v. EnglishKentucky Supreme Court · 1999
  3. Martin v. CommonwealthKentucky Supreme Court · 2006
  4. Commonwealth, Department of Highways v. TyreeCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1963
  5. Elwell v. StoneCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1990

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Allstate Property and Casualty Insurance Company v. Brittany BrownCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 2023
  2. Commonwealth of Kentucky v. Andrew McMichaelKentucky Supreme Court · 2023
  3. Kenneth Scott Higgins v. Ellie Scorsone-StovallCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 2023
  4. Micheal Pierson v. Stephanie HartlineCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API