Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Boyer v. Barney

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided June 27, 2007No. 021212721; A123799PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1ConcurrenceArmstrong, J.

Plaintiff appeals a judgment on the pleadings that dismissed his negligence claim against Salomon Smith Barney and two of its employees, Howell and Morell, for conduct related to commodity trading services. ORCP 21 B. On review, our task is to determine whether the pleadings establish that plaintiff cannot prevail on his negligence claim against defendants. Withers v. State of Oregon, 133 Or App 377, 382, 891 P2d 675, rev den, 321 Or 284 (1995).

When a claim is resolved against a plaintiff on the pleadings, we accept as true the well-pleaded allegations of fact in the pleadings, Slogowski v.…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Georgetown Realty, Inc. v. Home InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Bennett v. Farmers Insurance Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 2001
  3. Conway v. Pacific UniversityOregon Supreme Court · 1996
  4. Jones v. Emerald Pacific Homes, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2003
  5. Slogowski v. LynessOregon Supreme Court · 1996

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Boyer v. Salomon Smith BarneyOregon Supreme Court · 2008
  2. Boyer v. BarneyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API