Legal Opinion

Jones v. Emerald Pacific Homes, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided July 2, 2003No. CCV 9809193; A108879PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSchuman, J.

Emerald Pacific Homes, Inc. (Emerald) contracted to build plaintiffs a custom home. Satisfied with neither the quality nor the speed of construction, plaintiffs brought this action against Emerald and its owners (collectively, defendants) for negligence and breach of contract. At the conclusion of plaintiffs’ case-in-chief, the trial court granted defendants’ “motion for partial directed verdict” 1 on the negligence claim, ruling that the only duties that defendants allegedly breached derived from the contract and not from some independent source of law. The contract claim proceeded;…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Onita Pacific Corp. v. Trustees of BronsonOregon Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Georgetown Realty, Inc. v. Home InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 1992
  3. Conway v. Pacific UniversityOregon Supreme Court · 1996
  4. Securities-Intermountain, Inc. v. Sunset Fuel Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1980
  5. Strader v. Grange Mutual InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2002

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Roop v. PARKER NORTHWEST PAVING, CO.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2004
  2. Abraham v. T. Henry Construction, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 2011
  3. Shumake v. FosheeCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2005
  4. Abraham v. T. Henry Construction, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2009
  5. L. H. Morris Electric, Inc. v. Hyundai Semiconductor America, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2005

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API