Legal Opinion

Pittman v. Lieffring

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided June 5, 1973No. 147PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtConnor T. Hansen, J.

The sole issue raised by plaintiff on appeal is whether there was sufficient evidence for the trial court to instruct the jury as to the privileges granted the operator of an emergency vehicle. Plaintiff argues that the evidence, concerning the design, mounting and intensity of the red light on Lieffring’s vehicle, was insufficient to warrant giving the instructions covering the exemptions granted by sec. 346.03, Stats., to emergency vehicles, and, further, that sec. 347.25 is ambiguous, and hence if interpreted properly the red light on Lieffring’s vehicle did not meet the requirements of…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Arnold v. County Court of Rock CountyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1971
  2. Zillmer v. MiglautschWisconsin Supreme Court · 1967
  3. Guse v. A. O. Smith Corp.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1952
  4. Scanlon v. City of MenashaWisconsin Supreme Court · 1962
  5. Mundt v. Sheboygan & Fond du Lac RailroadWisconsin Supreme Court · 1872

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Schuh v. Fox River Tractor Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1974
  2. Cardinal v. Leader National Insurance Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1992
  3. In Re Estate of HaeseWisconsin Supreme Court · 1977
  4. State v. DanforthWisconsin Supreme Court · 1986
  5. NCR Corp. v. Department of RevenueCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1986

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API