Banister v. Fallis
Supreme Court of Kansas
Appeal from Cheyenne district court.
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
BURCH, J.:
The plaintiff, Banister, and the defendant, Fallís, agreed in writing to exchange land,- each party to furnish an abstract showing perfect title to his land. The parties met at a bank to close the trade, when a supposed defect in the title to the Fallís land *321was discovered. James L. Peacock had once owned the tract. In February, 1898, he deeded it to The McKinley-Lanning Loan & Trust Co. The records disclosed an unacknowledged instrument dated March 2, 1898, purporting to be an agreement on the part of “McKinley & Lanning” that if Peacock…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Wickersham v. Chicago Zinc Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1877
- McBride v. SteinwedenSupreme Court of Kansas · 1906
- Smith v. WorsterSupreme Court of Kansas · 1898
- Lee v. Missouri Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1903
- Fisher v. CowlesSupreme Court of Kansas · 1889
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Hoard v. JonesSupreme Court of Kansas · 1925
- Riffel v. DieterSupreme Court of Kansas · 1945
- Tawney v. BlankenshipSupreme Court of Kansas · 1939
- Empire Gas & Fuel Co. v. SternCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1926
- Nordman v. RauSupreme Court of Kansas · 1911
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.