Legal Opinion
Bailleaux v. Holmes
District Court, D. Oregon
Decided October 2, 1959No. Civ. 9831-9834, 9847, 9861, 9862PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SOLOMON, Chief Judge.
Plaintiffs are prisoners in the Oregon State Penitentiary at Salem, Oregon. Defendants are the Governor, Secretary of State, and the State Treasurer, comprising the State Board of Control, and the Warden and Deputy Warden of the penitentiary.
Each of the plaintiffs asserts either that he is illegally confined or that he must defend criminal charges pending against him in state or federal courts, that he is required to do all or part of the legal preparation himself because he cannot afford to engage an attorney, and that these matters require his immediate attention.…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Ex Parte HullSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Dowd v. United States Ex Rel. CookSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- United States of America Ex Rel. Joseph Marcial, A/K/A Joseph Johnson v. Edward M. Fay, Warden of Green Haven PrisonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1957
- Green v. State of MaineDistrict Court, D. Maine · 1953
- United States v. RandolphDistrict Court, E.D. Illinois · 1958
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Mark O. Hatfield, Governor of the State of Oregon v. Paul R. BailleauxCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1961
- Palmigiano v. TravisonoDistrict Court, D. Rhode Island · 1970
- Robert Draper v. B. J. Rhay, as Superintendent of Washington State PenitentiaryCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1963
- In Re FergusonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
- Pierce v. La ValleeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1961
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.